Archive for August, 2006
Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006
Vibrator
U.S. Patent No. D527,109 is a patent on the design of a vibrator. I don’t know why, but this just looks painful. I’ve seen other two-headed or dual-probe vibrators before that don’t look nearly as vicious. This just looks mean.
PP
1 Comment » - Posted in Vibrators, Dildos, Sleeves, etc., Female by patentpervert
Tuesday, August 15th, 2006
Buttock Form Enhancement Device
U.S. Patent NO. 7,089,601 is a patent claiming a device to improve the sizes and shapes of a person’s butt. One object of this device, over prior art is to be comfortable, without feeling like something “foreign” is on your ass. The wearer can select among various sizes, shapes and flexibility, and alter either the […]
No Comments » - Posted in Other Patents, Male, Female by patentpervert
Tuesday, August 8th, 2006
Male Exercise Device
U.S. Patent No. 7,086,998 is a patent for a torture device. Just kidding. But this does conjure up images I’ve seen of men with weights attached to their testicles, or to their penis (in an attempt to stretch it).
Although this patent is aimed at strengthening the penis (in addition to enlargring it). The object of this […]
No Comments » - Posted in Other Patents, Male by patentpervert
Tuesday, August 8th, 2006
Condom With Male Genital Desensitizer Lubricant
U.S. Patent No. 7,086,403 is a patent for a condom with a desensitizer (such as benzocaine) on the inside, thus eliminating the need for separately applying a desensitizer prior to applying the condom, and also avoiding contact of the desensitizer with one’s partner.
The patent further claims a method for packaging such a condom, where the […]
No Comments » - Posted in Condoms, pills, sponges, etc., Male by patentpervert
Tuesday, August 1st, 2006
Device for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction
U.S. Patent No. 7,083,570 is a patent for a penis pump. The patent claims that the device is more compact (and thus less intrusive) than the those in the prior art. I usually don’t comment on the validity of patents, but is it only me that thinks a patent of this nature is obvious?
PP
